• Home
  • keyboard_arrow_right Daily World News
  • keyboard_arrow_right What to expect from the US and Iran indirect negotiations in Vienna

Daily World News

What to expect from the US and Iran indirect negotiations in Vienna

CM 05/04/2021


Background
share close
WASHINGTON – US and Iranian delegations will arrive in Vienna on Tuesday for an indirect round of negotiations about a possible return to the 2015 nuclear agreement.
Thomas Countryman, who served as assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation from 2011 to 2017 and later as Acting Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, told The Jerusalem Post that indirect negotiations with a mediator are not an uncommon tool of diplomacy.
“There can be reasons why two countries are unable to engage directly,” he said. “In this case, the problem is not from the US side, but from the Iranian side, and it has to do with their own complex political situation. The countries in between – Britain, France, Germany, [and also] Russia and China, are trying to define what both Iran and the United States would have to do to return the JCPOA in full compliance.”
He went on to say that the next step would be working out a schedule of either simultaneous or staged steps that each side will take within a certain period. “That’s the task,” he said. “Obviously, it would be easier if the US and Iran were talking directly to each other about how we achieved the 2015 JCPOA.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in his confirmation hearing that the door to diplomacy with Tehran is open, and yet it took both sides nearly three months to arrange a first, indirect meeting. “It has to do with complex politics in both Tehran and Washington,” Countryman said. “In Washington, the President has many other priorities. He doesn’t have his foreign policy team confirmed by the Senate. Very importantly, he needs Congress in order to accomplish the urgent programs he has on COVID relief, economic stimulus, climate change, infrastructure. And there is some disagreement, even among the Democrats, about the right way to approach Iran. So he has been somewhat cautious in approaching this. He does want to hear a variety of voices, including from those in the Congress who may disagree with him, including from our friends of the Middle East who are Iran’s neighbors. But he’s also been clear and remains clear that the goal is to return to full compliance and afterward to work on negotiating an agreement that builds on the way that extensive Internet addresses other issues.”
The US original position was that “if Iran comes to compliance, we will do the same.” It now seems like other options might be on the table, such as a return to mutual compliance, including sanction relief. Do you see it as a concession from the US side?
“I see it as realism because both the US and Iran, in the absence of face-to-face negotiations, were making statements that said the other side needs to go first. If that kind of standoff, somebody has to come up with a more productive approach. That’s what the other parties to the agreement – who, unlike the US, are still in compliance with the document they signed – that’s what they’ve been working on, how to work it out so that neither side has to say, “we blinked first. We said we would not move first, and then we did.”
“It is a strange situation because both Presidents Rouhani and I say we want full compliance by both sides. The goal is agreed already, but deciding who will first has been an issue. And as I say, the issue has been complicated in both capitals by very intense domestic politics.”
How the upcoming election in Iran affects the timeline?
“I remain optimistic [that both sides could find a formula to return to the agreement,] but far from certain. In my experience as a diplomat, it is easier to negotiate with the people that you have negotiated with before. If this drags out until a new election in Iran, and there is a new president, both sides still need some form of agreement, but working with a new team would be more difficult than what is possible right now. I have no inside information from the frustration, but I think that the Biden team understands that.”

Source

Rate it
Author

CM

The host of Coffee Mouth Scare Crow Show and CEO of 452 Impact, Inc. Here is food for thought. Romans 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." John 3:16 "For God so love ed the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shall be saved."

list Archive

Background

Post comments

This post currently has no comments.

Leave a reply